Where procedural AI meets clinical evidence.
Aimbient is backed by more than a decade of independent clinical research proving that ambient procedural AI reduces mortality and optimizes team performance.
Checklist Outcomes
Ambient AI directly correlates to lives saved.
In a Surgical Endoscopy study of 4,581 patients, Surgical Safety Checklist performance was measured using Aimbient’s AI-based video review.
01
Lower mortality
Associated with stronger checklist performance
02
Shorter stays
Associated with stronger checklist performance
03
Reduced ICU admissions
Linked to better debriefing performance
Tags
Aimbient’s automated tagging is a strong, independent predictor of patient outcomes.
A study of 2,875 inpatient surgical cases showed Aimbient’s automated tags improving prediction performance across postoperative outcomes, turning intraoperative events into scalable outcome-prediction signals.
The room contains outcome signals the chart alone cannot capture.
Real-time AI processing can accurately identify risk profiles before patients even leave recovery.
WHY PROCEDURAL TRUTH MATTERS

The Completion Illusion
In a hybrid OR study of 212 procedures, reported checklist completion averaged 95.5%, while Aimbient observation showed average observed completion of 46.8%.

The Chart Gap
In a gynecologic surgery study, Aimbient video review found checklist quality of 47%, compared with 89% documented in the electronic medical record.

Beyond the Checkbox
The first Aimbient checklist study analyzed 3,879 cases and concluded that the Aimbient enables more accurate checklist adherence monitoring and identification of and addressing of safety threats arising from noncompliance.
Team Performance
The “soft stuff” changes care.
Leadership, communication, assessment, decision-making, situational awareness, and team coordination are not soft metrics. They shape how fast teams move and how reliably care progresses.
A multicenter trauma video review study of 441 patients found that better leadership, communication, assessment/decision-making, and situational awareness were associated with faster transition to the next phase of care. Each 1-point worsening in T-NOTECHS score was associated with 1.6 additional minutes in the trauma bay.
Video-based multidisciplinary review
A video-based multidisciplinary review program increased meeting attendance from 40 to 400+ and generated institution-level interventions, including changes to retained-foreign-object workflows, blood-scanning workflows, specimen allocation, Code Hemorrhage, Universal Protocol, and closed-loop communication projects.
Trauma
Trauma quality cannot rely on memory.
Trauma care is fast, high-risk, and team-dependent. The evidence base shows that video review can reveal technical and non-technical performance signals that are missed by traditional records.
Faster transitions to next phase of care
Better trauma team performance was associated with faster transition to the next phase of care in hypotensive trauma patients.
Vascular access and time to resuscitation
In an EAST multicenter study with 1,410 access attempts across 581 patients, intraosseous access had a higher success rate than peripheral IV or central venous catheter access and supported faster resuscitation initiation in hypotensive trauma patients.
Adverse event detection and trauma safety
A narrative review concluded that trauma video review, when integrated with standardized tools such as STAT Taxonomy and T-NOTECHS, shows promise for identifying adverse events, improving trauma team performance, and enhancing patient safety.
Don’t guess. Measure reality.
Bring the most proven procedural intelligence platform to your clinical teams today.